https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372843 The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Commissioner (A) due to non-compliance with pre-deposit, without deciding on the merits. The appellant's stay application was granted as they had a strong prima facie case supported by previous judgments. The Commissioner (A) was instructed to hear the case promptly and decide within three months from the Tribunal's order. en-us Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jan 2019 06:37:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372843 The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Commissioner (A) due to non-compliance with pre-deposit, without deciding on the merits. The appellant's stay application was granted as they had a strong prima facie case supported by previous judgments. The Commissioner (A) was instructed to hear the case promptly and decide within three months from the Tribunal's order. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372843