https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277941 No substantial question of law arose where the Tribunal followed an earlier unchallenged decision and a Board circular stating that abatement could not be denied merely because duty was not paid in advance. In the absence of any contrary position being shown, the High Court left the impugned order undisturbed and declined to entertain the appeal, which was dismissed at the threshold. en-us Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Dec 2018 16:41:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277941 No substantial question of law arose where the Tribunal followed an earlier unchallenged decision and a Board circular stating that abatement could not be denied merely because duty was not paid in advance. In the absence of any contrary position being shown, the High Court left the impugned order undisturbed and declined to entertain the appeal, which was dismissed at the threshold. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277941