<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (1) TMI 64 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277940</link>
    <description>A nationalisation scheme under Section 68-C of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 must reflect the State Transport Undertaking&#039;s independent opinion formed in public interest, and a scheme made to implement the Chief Minister&#039;s wishes is invalid. The scheme must also state definite particulars of the proposed services, including the number of vehicles and trips, so that objections can be raised and adequacy assessed; vague minimum and maximum ranges do not satisfy the statutory and rule-based requirement. Where the routes are wholly within the State, inclusion of services does not attract the need for previous Central Government approval under the inter-State route proviso. The Regional Transport Authority remains competent to act under an approved scheme notwithstanding inconsistent route-length restrictions in the general rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 15:44:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (1) TMI 64 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277940</link>
      <description>A nationalisation scheme under Section 68-C of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 must reflect the State Transport Undertaking&#039;s independent opinion formed in public interest, and a scheme made to implement the Chief Minister&#039;s wishes is invalid. The scheme must also state definite particulars of the proposed services, including the number of vehicles and trips, so that objections can be raised and adequacy assessed; vague minimum and maximum ranges do not satisfy the statutory and rule-based requirement. Where the routes are wholly within the State, inclusion of services does not attract the need for previous Central Government approval under the inter-State route proviso. The Regional Transport Authority remains competent to act under an approved scheme notwithstanding inconsistent route-length restrictions in the general rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>