<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1603 - SIKKIM HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372834</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the rejoinder was condoned, the Goods and Services Tax Council and the concerned State GST officers were impleaded as respondents, and leave was granted to file an amended writ petition. The procedural reliefs were allowed on the issues raised, enabling the petitioners to proceed with the writ in its amended form with the additional respondents on record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1603 - SIKKIM HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372834</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the rejoinder was condoned, the Goods and Services Tax Council and the concerned State GST officers were impleaded as respondents, and leave was granted to file an amended writ petition. The procedural reliefs were allowed on the issues raised, enabling the petitioners to proceed with the writ in its amended form with the additional respondents on record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>