https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372831 The case involved an allegation of profiteering by the Respondent regarding the supply of "Handloom Design-King Supreme Lungi" post-GST implementation. The DGAP's investigation revealed no reduction in the tax rate on the product, leading to the conclusion that the Respondent did not contravene Section 171 of the CGST Act. Consequently, the application was dismissed, as there was no merit in the profiteering allegation, and the case was to be closed. en-us Thu, 27 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372831 The case involved an allegation of profiteering by the Respondent regarding the supply of "Handloom Design-King Supreme Lungi" post-GST implementation. The DGAP's investigation revealed no reduction in the tax rate on the product, leading to the conclusion that the Respondent did not contravene Section 171 of the CGST Act. Consequently, the application was dismissed, as there was no merit in the profiteering allegation, and the case was to be closed. Case-Laws GST Thu, 27 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372831