<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 32 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16016</link>
    <description>Income arising from rubber estates in Malaysia could not be included in the assessee&#039;s taxable income in India where the India-Malaysia double taxation avoidance agreement protected that income from Indian tax. The Madras HC followed its earlier decision on the same issue and held that Malaysian income was not assessable under the Income-tax Act, 1961, in view of the applicable treaty protection. The Revenue&#039;s contention was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:15:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 32 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16016</link>
      <description>Income arising from rubber estates in Malaysia could not be included in the assessee&#039;s taxable income in India where the India-Malaysia double taxation avoidance agreement protected that income from Indian tax. The Madras HC followed its earlier decision on the same issue and held that Malaysian income was not assessable under the Income-tax Act, 1961, in view of the applicable treaty protection. The Revenue&#039;s contention was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>