<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1590 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372821</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act 1961 for the assessment year 2012-13. The ITAT emphasized that the mere disallowance of a claim does not automatically lead to a penalty, following the principles outlined in the Supreme Court decision in Reliance Petroproducts (P.) Ltd. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the penalty by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 07:35:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1590 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372821</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act 1961 for the assessment year 2012-13. The ITAT emphasized that the mere disallowance of a claim does not automatically lead to a penalty, following the principles outlined in the Supreme Court decision in Reliance Petroproducts (P.) Ltd. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the penalty by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>