https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372811 An appeal filed after an unexplained delay of 442 days was dismissed because no satisfactory explanation was offered for condonation, and the procedural bar was treated as sufficient to decline relief. The Court also examined the merits independently and found that the appeal disclosed no substance, so it was rejected on substantive grounds as well. The result was dismissal both for delay and on merits. en-us Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Dec 2018 07:34:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372811 An appeal filed after an unexplained delay of 442 days was dismissed because no satisfactory explanation was offered for condonation, and the procedural bar was treated as sufficient to decline relief. The Court also examined the merits independently and found that the appeal disclosed no substance, so it was rejected on substantive grounds as well. The result was dismissal both for delay and on merits. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 05 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372811