<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1572 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372803</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned orders and remitted the case back to the original authority for further consideration. The respondent was directed to issue a corrigendum regarding any notification repealing or withdrawing the 1975 exemption. If no such notification existed, the earlier assessment would stand. The proceedings were to be completed within eight weeks. The writ petitions were disposed of with the above directions, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 07:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=550132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1572 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372803</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned orders and remitted the case back to the original authority for further consideration. The respondent was directed to issue a corrigendum regarding any notification repealing or withdrawing the 1975 exemption. If no such notification existed, the earlier assessment would stand. The proceedings were to be completed within eight weeks. The writ petitions were disposed of with the above directions, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>