https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372802 The court remanded the case back to the second respondent for reconsideration of whether the goods sold by the petitioner fell within the purview of the Eighth Schedule for claiming concession/exemption under Section 3(5) of the TNGST Act. The second respondent was directed to pass a speaking order, allowing the petitioner to file additional representation and completing the proceedings within six weeks from the date of the order. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. en-us Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Dec 2018 16:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372802 The court remanded the case back to the second respondent for reconsideration of whether the goods sold by the petitioner fell within the purview of the Eighth Schedule for claiming concession/exemption under Section 3(5) of the TNGST Act. The second respondent was directed to pass a speaking order, allowing the petitioner to file additional representation and completing the proceedings within six weeks from the date of the order. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372802