<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 68 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16007</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the taxation of remuneration paid to foreign directors and employees, stating that the exemption is limited to the amount actually exempted under the Income-tax Act. Additionally, the court denied the assessee&#039;s claim for full exemption under sections 40A(5) and 40(c). Regarding the deduction claim under section 35B for certification charges and warranty claims, the court held that the expenses did not qualify for weighted deduction as they did not align with the amended provisions of the Act. Consequently, the court rejected the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 35B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:47:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 68 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16007</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the taxation of remuneration paid to foreign directors and employees, stating that the exemption is limited to the amount actually exempted under the Income-tax Act. Additionally, the court denied the assessee&#039;s claim for full exemption under sections 40A(5) and 40(c). Regarding the deduction claim under section 35B for certification charges and warranty claims, the court held that the expenses did not qualify for weighted deduction as they did not align with the amended provisions of the Act. Consequently, the court rejected the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 35B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>