<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15998</link>
    <description>Jackpot or race-winning income was treated as having accrued and been received before 1 April 1972, placing it in the accounting period 1971-72 relevant to assessment year 1972-73. Because the case involved no factual distinction from an earlier decision on identical facts, the same reasoning was applied. The reference was answered in the affirmative and against the Revenue, so the income was not assessable for assessment year 1973-74.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:38:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15998</link>
      <description>Jackpot or race-winning income was treated as having accrued and been received before 1 April 1972, placing it in the accounting period 1971-72 relevant to assessment year 1972-73. Because the case involved no factual distinction from an earlier decision on identical facts, the same reasoning was applied. The reference was answered in the affirmative and against the Revenue, so the income was not assessable for assessment year 1973-74.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>