<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1557 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372788</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO regarding the treatment of trial run income from a power plant as revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that the income should be capitalized, aligning with accounting standards and previous court decisions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection on the reopening of the assessment was not argued and thus dismissed. The decision was pronounced on 16-11-2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2018 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1557 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372788</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO regarding the treatment of trial run income from a power plant as revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that the income should be capitalized, aligning with accounting standards and previous court decisions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection on the reopening of the assessment was not argued and thus dismissed. The decision was pronounced on 16-11-2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>