<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Tax Assessment on Property Transactions u/s 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) of Income Tax Act; No Relief for Assessee.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43596</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 56(2)(vii) being the difference between value mentioned in the Conveyance Deed and the stamp duty value of Immovable properties - This is not the assessee’s case that his four transactions are in any way covered in the last proviso. No reason to interfere with the lower authorities’ action invoking section 56(2)(vii)(b) clause (ii) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2018 11:33:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2018 11:33:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Tax Assessment on Property Transactions u/s 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) of Income Tax Act; No Relief for Assessee.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43596</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 56(2)(vii) being the difference between value mentioned in the Conveyance Deed and the stamp duty value of Immovable properties - This is not the assessee’s case that his four transactions are in any way covered in the last proviso. No reason to interfere with the lower authorities’ action invoking section 56(2)(vii)(b) clause (ii) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2018 11:33:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>