<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 45 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15989</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to treat the petitioner&#039;s return of income as invalid and non-est due to non-payment of tax and non-furnishing of proof thereof. The Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s rejection of the revision petition was affirmed, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s failure to comply with tax payment requirements. The court found no fault with the impugned orders and dismissed the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:19:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 45 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15989</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to treat the petitioner&#039;s return of income as invalid and non-est due to non-payment of tax and non-furnishing of proof thereof. The Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s rejection of the revision petition was affirmed, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s failure to comply with tax payment requirements. The court found no fault with the impugned orders and dismissed the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>