<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1172 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277904</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed. The addition on account of undervaluation of closing stock was deleted, and the issue of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 15:46:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1172 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277904</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed. The addition on account of undervaluation of closing stock was deleted, and the issue of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>