<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 711 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277902</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the petition, quashing the Public Notice dated 28th January 2004. It ruled that the Notifications dated 21st and 23rd April 2004 would have prospective operation only. The exports made by the petitioners before these Notifications will be considered for determining their entitlement. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 14:55:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 711 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277902</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the petition, quashing the Public Notice dated 28th January 2004. It ruled that the Notifications dated 21st and 23rd April 2004 would have prospective operation only. The exports made by the petitioners before these Notifications will be considered for determining their entitlement. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>