<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1521 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372752</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the case for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need to analyze the lease agreement and the impact of Accounting Standard 19 on lease classification. The Court criticized the Tribunal for not adequately considering these aspects and directed a thorough review, leaving the Substantial Questions of Law open for reconsideration. The appeals were allowed without costs, instructing a reevaluation of all factual and legal aspects in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 11:36:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1521 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372752</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the case for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need to analyze the lease agreement and the impact of Accounting Standard 19 on lease classification. The Court criticized the Tribunal for not adequately considering these aspects and directed a thorough review, leaving the Substantial Questions of Law open for reconsideration. The appeals were allowed without costs, instructing a reevaluation of all factual and legal aspects in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>