<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Hedging Loss Claim Denied: Insufficient Evidence Shows NCDEX Transactions Were for Hedging Actual Goods Contracts.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43573</link>
    <description>Disallowance in respect of Hedging Loss - there is no such detail available to show that the alleged transactions entered on the portal of NCDEX were entered to counter or hedge the probable loss from the contract for actual delivery of goods. - To be treated as speculative loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 11:35:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 11:35:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Hedging Loss Claim Denied: Insufficient Evidence Shows NCDEX Transactions Were for Hedging Actual Goods Contracts.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43573</link>
      <description>Disallowance in respect of Hedging Loss - there is no such detail available to show that the alleged transactions entered on the portal of NCDEX were entered to counter or hedge the probable loss from the contract for actual delivery of goods. - To be treated as speculative loss.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 11:35:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>