https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372716 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked against an order granting conditional leave to defend in a summary suit where a statutory revisional remedy under Section 115 CPC is available. The court also noted that a conditional deposit may be justified when the defence to the suit and cheque liability appears highly improbable, especially where there is inconsistency in the stand taken, an admission of dealings in Section 138 proceedings, the statutory presumption under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and no credible material of fraud or misrepresentation. On that basis, the conditional order requiring deposit of 50% of the suit amount was upheld and the challenge failed. en-us Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Dec 2018 10:18:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372716 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked against an order granting conditional leave to defend in a summary suit where a statutory revisional remedy under Section 115 CPC is available. The court also noted that a conditional deposit may be justified when the defence to the suit and cheque liability appears highly improbable, especially where there is inconsistency in the stand taken, an admission of dealings in Section 138 proceedings, the statutory presumption under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and no credible material of fraud or misrepresentation. On that basis, the conditional order requiring deposit of 50% of the suit amount was upheld and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372716