<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1471 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372702</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim for unutilized MODVAT Credit due to limitation and lack of merit. However, the refund of the PLA balance was permitted. The Member (Judicial) suggested remanding the case for a fresh decision on both limitation and merits, awaiting the Larger Bench decision of the Bombay High Court on similar issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1471 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372702</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim for unutilized MODVAT Credit due to limitation and lack of merit. However, the refund of the PLA balance was permitted. The Member (Judicial) suggested remanding the case for a fresh decision on both limitation and merits, awaiting the Larger Bench decision of the Bombay High Court on similar issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>