https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372700 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeal)'s order. It ruled in favor of the appellant's valuation method based on actual transaction value and waste generation percentage. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's compliance with duty payment on actual quantity cleared and rejected demands based on hypothetical figures. Additionally, it concluded that the waste was marketable, as the appellant had classified and paid duty on the waste cleared. The Tribunal did not address the issue of penalty and interest imposition in its judgment. en-us Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Dec 2018 10:18:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372700 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeal)'s order. It ruled in favor of the appellant's valuation method based on actual transaction value and waste generation percentage. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's compliance with duty payment on actual quantity cleared and rejected demands based on hypothetical figures. Additionally, it concluded that the waste was marketable, as the appellant had classified and paid duty on the waste cleared. The Tribunal did not address the issue of penalty and interest imposition in its judgment. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372700