<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1468 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372699</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was held maintainable because the dispute turned on interpretation of the statutory entries on admitted facts, not on jurisdictional error or natural justice. On classification, slaughtering, defeathering, cleaning and cutting of chicken with machinery for market supply was treated as processing; processed poultry therefore fell under the taxable entry for processed meat and poultry, while the exemption for meat, fish, poultry and livestock could not be expanded to cover processed goods. The penalty was also upheld because the turnover suppression and tax classification were sustained, and the final result was dismissal of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1468 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372699</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was held maintainable because the dispute turned on interpretation of the statutory entries on admitted facts, not on jurisdictional error or natural justice. On classification, slaughtering, defeathering, cleaning and cutting of chicken with machinery for market supply was treated as processing; processed poultry therefore fell under the taxable entry for processed meat and poultry, while the exemption for meat, fish, poultry and livestock could not be expanded to cover processed goods. The penalty was also upheld because the turnover suppression and tax classification were sustained, and the final result was dismissal of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>