<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1339 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277890</link>
    <description>Section 19 imposes a five-year limit on reopening by the assessing authority, but the fast track assessment regime under Section 17D allowed assessments pending on 1 April 2007 to be completed by a Commissioner-constituted team. The proviso to Section 17D(2)(d) permitted reopening with the prior permission of the Commissioner and did not prescribe a separate time limit. The later proviso introduced by the Finance Act, 2010 confirmed that, where an assessment completed under the Act is reopened with the Commissioner&#039;s permission, the Section 19 limitation does not apply, so such reassessment remains valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 07:01:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1339 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277890</link>
      <description>Section 19 imposes a five-year limit on reopening by the assessing authority, but the fast track assessment regime under Section 17D allowed assessments pending on 1 April 2007 to be completed by a Commissioner-constituted team. The proviso to Section 17D(2)(d) permitted reopening with the prior permission of the Commissioner and did not prescribe a separate time limit. The later proviso introduced by the Finance Act, 2010 confirmed that, where an assessment completed under the Act is reopened with the Commissioner&#039;s permission, the Section 19 limitation does not apply, so such reassessment remains valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>