https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277892 Non-compliance with the Section 41-A CrPC notice requirement rendered the arrest unlawful where the record did not show any lawful refusal of service or any factual basis for immediate arrest. The Bombay HC held that the material before it failed to establish a legally sustainable ground for detention, especially when appearance had been indicated for a later date. Continued detention was therefore contrary to law and violated Article 21 of the Constitution, and the detenue was directed to be released forthwith in habeas corpus jurisdiction. en-us Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Dec 2018 07:01:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277892 Non-compliance with the Section 41-A CrPC notice requirement rendered the arrest unlawful where the record did not show any lawful refusal of service or any factual basis for immediate arrest. The Bombay HC held that the material before it failed to establish a legally sustainable ground for detention, especially when appearance had been indicated for a later date. Continued detention was therefore contrary to law and violated Article 21 of the Constitution, and the detenue was directed to be released forthwith in habeas corpus jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277892