https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277887 In a second appeal, a High Court must formulate substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC and, if it proposes a new question later, give the parties prior notice and a fair opportunity of hearing. Framing and deciding an additional question at dictation stage without reasons or notice offends the statutory scheme and fairness. The Court also cannot disturb concurrent findings of fact unless a properly formulated substantial question of law truly justifies interference. The High Court's reversal, based on an erroneous factual premise and without addressing the questions framed at admission, was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing the parties. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2024 17:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277887 In a second appeal, a High Court must formulate substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC and, if it proposes a new question later, give the parties prior notice and a fair opportunity of hearing. Framing and deciding an additional question at dictation stage without reasons or notice offends the statutory scheme and fairness. The Court also cannot disturb concurrent findings of fact unless a properly formulated substantial question of law truly justifies interference. The High Court's reversal, based on an erroneous factual premise and without addressing the questions framed at admission, was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing the parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277887