https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277886 A coparcener cannot obtain a perpetual injunction to stop the karta of a joint Hindu family from alienating coparcenary property. The text states that the manager may alienate such property for legal necessity, benefit of the estate, or antecedent debt, and that an unlawful alienation should be challenged after it is made rather than restrained in advance. Sections 38 and 41(h) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 bar injunction relief where an efficacious alternative remedy exists, and a suit of this kind would also require issues of title and property character to be decided in an unsuitable proceeding. en-us Wed, 13 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Dec 2018 17:18:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277886 A coparcener cannot obtain a perpetual injunction to stop the karta of a joint Hindu family from alienating coparcenary property. The text states that the manager may alienate such property for legal necessity, benefit of the estate, or antecedent debt, and that an unlawful alienation should be challenged after it is made rather than restrained in advance. Sections 38 and 41(h) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 bar injunction relief where an efficacious alternative remedy exists, and a suit of this kind would also require issues of title and property character to be decided in an unsuitable proceeding. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277886