<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 599 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277885</link>
    <description>The Allahabad High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of commission payments, finding them justified and aligned with business expediency. However, the Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding cash credits, emphasizing the need for the assessee to prove the creditworthiness of creditors. The judgment reinforces the requirement for the assessee to establish the identity, capacity, and genuineness of cash credits under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 17:11:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 599 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277885</link>
      <description>The Allahabad High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of commission payments, finding them justified and aligned with business expediency. However, the Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding cash credits, emphasizing the need for the assessee to prove the creditworthiness of creditors. The judgment reinforces the requirement for the assessee to establish the identity, capacity, and genuineness of cash credits under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>