<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 54 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15963</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay addressed the deductibility of secret commission as business expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction without considering the newly added Explanation to section 37(1) was incorrect. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for re-examination in light of the Explanation, emphasizing the need to ensure expenses comply with legal amendments retrospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:28:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 54 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15963</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay addressed the deductibility of secret commission as business expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction without considering the newly added Explanation to section 37(1) was incorrect. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for re-examination in light of the Explanation, emphasizing the need to ensure expenses comply with legal amendments retrospectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>