<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1462 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372693</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision that Letter of Credit (LC) discount charges were reimbursements to suppliers for expenses, not interest payments. As no interest was paid, section 194A did not apply, justifying the deletion of the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2008-09.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:02:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1462 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372693</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision that Letter of Credit (LC) discount charges were reimbursements to suppliers for expenses, not interest payments. As no interest was paid, section 194A did not apply, justifying the deletion of the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2008-09.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>