<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1458 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in an appeal against the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order for Assessment Year 2010-11. The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 54F, determining that the land transferred was used to acquire a new residential property, making them eligible for the deduction. Additionally, the Tribunal found no error in the assessment order regarding the non-admission of rental income, stating that it was not both erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue as required under section 263. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:01:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1458 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in an appeal against the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order for Assessment Year 2010-11. The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 54F, determining that the land transferred was used to acquire a new residential property, making them eligible for the deduction. Additionally, the Tribunal found no error in the assessment order regarding the non-admission of rental income, stating that it was not both erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue as required under section 263. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>