<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 87 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15960</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Officer&#039;s decision to reopen assessments under section 147(a) due to the assessee&#039;s failure to fully disclose certain expenditures. The court determined that property tax, electricity charges, depreciation, and repairs should be included in the disallowable amount under section 40A(5), except for property tax which was deemed not includable. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, awarding costs of Rs. 1,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:22:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 87 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15960</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Officer&#039;s decision to reopen assessments under section 147(a) due to the assessee&#039;s failure to fully disclose certain expenditures. The court determined that property tax, electricity charges, depreciation, and repairs should be included in the disallowable amount under section 40A(5), except for property tax which was deemed not includable. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, awarding costs of Rs. 1,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>