<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1442 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372673</link>
    <description>A challenge was raised to Notification No. 4 of 2018-Central Tax (Rate) and Notification No. 4 of 2018-State Tax (Rate) on the basis that they purported to tax an activity said not to amount to a service or supply of service. The petition was directed to be served on the respondents and was adjourned for further hearing, with no final adjudication on the validity of the notifications at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1442 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372673</link>
      <description>A challenge was raised to Notification No. 4 of 2018-Central Tax (Rate) and Notification No. 4 of 2018-State Tax (Rate) on the basis that they purported to tax an activity said not to amount to a service or supply of service. The petition was directed to be served on the respondents and was adjourned for further hearing, with no final adjudication on the validity of the notifications at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>