https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372663 The Tribunal set aside the rejection of the refund claim and allowed the appeal, emphasizing compliance with the conditions of Notification No. 158/95-Cus for re-imported goods. The decision highlighted the error in rejecting the claim based on the failure to challenge the original assessment order, stating that such grounds were beyond the scope of the remand order. The appellant's fulfillment of conditions and permission to reprocess the goods led to the Tribunal granting consequential relief in favor of the appellant. en-us Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:00:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372663 The Tribunal set aside the rejection of the refund claim and allowed the appeal, emphasizing compliance with the conditions of Notification No. 158/95-Cus for re-imported goods. The decision highlighted the error in rejecting the claim based on the failure to challenge the original assessment order, stating that such grounds were beyond the scope of the remand order. The appellant's fulfillment of conditions and permission to reprocess the goods led to the Tribunal granting consequential relief in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372663