https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372657 The Tribunal remanded the case concerning disputed CENVAT Credit back to the original authority for further verification. It found that denial of the credit solely based on the disputed services not meeting the definition of input service was unjustified. The appellant was instructed to provide documentary evidence demonstrating the conformity of the disputed services to the definition of input services and their use in providing the output service. The appellant was granted a personal hearing during the re-adjudication process, with all issues from the appeal remaining open for consideration by the original authority. en-us Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Dec 2018 15:59:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372657 The Tribunal remanded the case concerning disputed CENVAT Credit back to the original authority for further verification. It found that denial of the credit solely based on the disputed services not meeting the definition of input service was unjustified. The appellant was instructed to provide documentary evidence demonstrating the conformity of the disputed services to the definition of input services and their use in providing the output service. The appellant was granted a personal hearing during the re-adjudication process, with all issues from the appeal remaining open for consideration by the original authority. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372657