https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372654 The Court allowed the concerned applicants to re-credit the Cenvat account, treating the amount as a voluntary deposit to be returned as initially paid. The petitioner's anticipatory credit under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, was deemed illegal, and the original adjudicating authority was directed to recover the unauthorized credit. The Court issued a notice returnable on 27th December, 2018, restraining coercive recovery pending further proceedings. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Nov 2020 13:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372654 The Court allowed the concerned applicants to re-credit the Cenvat account, treating the amount as a voluntary deposit to be returned as initially paid. The petitioner's anticipatory credit under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, was deemed illegal, and the original adjudicating authority was directed to recover the unauthorized credit. The Court issued a notice returnable on 27th December, 2018, restraining coercive recovery pending further proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372654