<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 45 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15957</link>
    <description>The High Court of MADRAS ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reconstituted firm, with the same partners except for the deceased partner, was entitled to benefits under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act. Despite the dissolution and reconstitution, the court emphasized the continuity of the export business and growth in exports as key factors. The court criticized the Tribunal for denying the benefits and stressed the significance of business continuity over legal formalities, ultimately deciding in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:17:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 45 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15957</link>
      <description>The High Court of MADRAS ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reconstituted firm, with the same partners except for the deceased partner, was entitled to benefits under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act. Despite the dissolution and reconstitution, the court emphasized the continuity of the export business and growth in exports as key factors. The court criticized the Tribunal for denying the benefits and stressed the significance of business continuity over legal formalities, ultimately deciding in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>