<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 52 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15956</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, despite challenges based on constitutional grounds. It emphasized Parliament&#039;s authority to enact laws retrospectively and the discretionary power of assessing authorities in setting reasonable timeframes for filing returns. The judgment highlighted the need for compliance with retrospective laws and the rectification of orders not in alignment with such amendments. Ultimately, the petition challenging the validity of section 148 was dismissed for lacking legal merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:16:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 52 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15956</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, despite challenges based on constitutional grounds. It emphasized Parliament&#039;s authority to enact laws retrospectively and the discretionary power of assessing authorities in setting reasonable timeframes for filing returns. The judgment highlighted the need for compliance with retrospective laws and the rectification of orders not in alignment with such amendments. Ultimately, the petition challenging the validity of section 148 was dismissed for lacking legal merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>