<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1807 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277880</link>
    <description>Receipts from the sale and distribution of software products to Indian distributors were held not to be royalty under the India-Ireland DTAA or the Income-tax Act. The arrangement gave only a non-exclusive, non-transferable right to supply shrink-wrap software, while copyright ownership remained with the assessee and the agreements barred copying, reverse engineering, sublicensing, and other copyright exploitation. Because the payer obtained only a copyrighted article and no right to use or exploit copyright, the treaty definition of royalty was not satisfied. Domestic law amendments could not expand the treaty meaning, so the software distribution receipts were not taxable in India as royalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 15:58:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1807 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277880</link>
      <description>Receipts from the sale and distribution of software products to Indian distributors were held not to be royalty under the India-Ireland DTAA or the Income-tax Act. The arrangement gave only a non-exclusive, non-transferable right to supply shrink-wrap software, while copyright ownership remained with the assessee and the agreements barred copying, reverse engineering, sublicensing, and other copyright exploitation. Because the payer obtained only a copyrighted article and no right to use or exploit copyright, the treaty definition of royalty was not satisfied. Domestic law amendments could not expand the treaty meaning, so the software distribution receipts were not taxable in India as royalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>