<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15955</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act based on new information indicating potential income escapement. It emphasized the relevance of the information, consistency in reasoning across related appeals, and interconnected nature of sister concerns&#039; assessments. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Income-tax Officer&#039;s belief that income had escaped assessment was supported by relevant materials. The judgment clarified the legal standards for initiating reassessment and highlighted the importance of consistent reasoning in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:15:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15955</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act based on new information indicating potential income escapement. It emphasized the relevance of the information, consistency in reasoning across related appeals, and interconnected nature of sister concerns&#039; assessments. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Income-tax Officer&#039;s belief that income had escaped assessment was supported by relevant materials. The judgment clarified the legal standards for initiating reassessment and highlighted the importance of consistent reasoning in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>