https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277866 The court dismissed the petition seeking to restrain a Judge appointed as a Commission under the Commissions of Inquiry Act from commencing an inquiry until the conclusion of criminal cases against the petitioners. The court emphasized that the inquiry focused on public importance matters, not individual conduct during specific incidents, and clarified that statements made before the Commission could not be used against individuals in civil or criminal proceedings except in cases of false evidence. The court highlighted the inquisitional nature of the Commission's proceedings and its focus on fact-finding rather than adjudication, ultimately concluding that there was no basis to restrain the Commission from conducting the inquiry. en-us Sat, 04 May 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Dec 2018 14:26:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277866 The court dismissed the petition seeking to restrain a Judge appointed as a Commission under the Commissions of Inquiry Act from commencing an inquiry until the conclusion of criminal cases against the petitioners. The court emphasized that the inquiry focused on public importance matters, not individual conduct during specific incidents, and clarified that statements made before the Commission could not be used against individuals in civil or criminal proceedings except in cases of false evidence. The court highlighted the inquisitional nature of the Commission's proceedings and its focus on fact-finding rather than adjudication, ultimately concluding that there was no basis to restrain the Commission from conducting the inquiry. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 04 May 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277866