<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1930 (9) TMI 18 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277865</link>
    <description>The judgment by Harrison, J. determined that the Commissioners appointed to inquire into the conduct of an executive engineer qualified as a Court under Section 195, Criminal P.C. The Commissioners, though not directly delivering judgments, were considered a Court due to their authority to take evidence and provide recommendations akin to the Privy Council. Consequently, a complaint by the Commissioners was deemed necessary in the legal dispute, emphasizing the importance of interpreting the term &quot;Court&quot; within the statutory framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 14:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1930 (9) TMI 18 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277865</link>
      <description>The judgment by Harrison, J. determined that the Commissioners appointed to inquire into the conduct of an executive engineer qualified as a Court under Section 195, Criminal P.C. The Commissioners, though not directly delivering judgments, were considered a Court due to their authority to take evidence and provide recommendations akin to the Privy Council. Consequently, a complaint by the Commissioners was deemed necessary in the legal dispute, emphasizing the importance of interpreting the term &quot;Court&quot; within the statutory framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>