https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277863 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, declaring their continued detention unconstitutional and void. It emphasized the need for fair consideration of detenus' representations, highlighted breaches of constitutional mandates under Articles 14 and 22, and criticized the mechanical confirmation of detention orders without proper assessment. The judgment stressed the importance of upholding constitutional safeguards in preventive detention cases to prevent it from becoming punitive, directing the immediate release of the petitioners if not needed for other cases. en-us Wed, 24 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277863 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, declaring their continued detention unconstitutional and void. It emphasized the need for fair consideration of detenus' representations, highlighted breaches of constitutional mandates under Articles 14 and 22, and criticized the mechanical confirmation of detention orders without proper assessment. The judgment stressed the importance of upholding constitutional safeguards in preventive detention cases to prevent it from becoming punitive, directing the immediate release of the petitioners if not needed for other cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277863