<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1754 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277859</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed as the Tribunal restricted the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) to 30% of the total addition, in line with previous rulings. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to limit the disallowance accordingly and allowed the assessee to seek similar treatment in subsequent years. The decision provided relief to the assessee and emphasized adherence to legal principles. The judgment was pronounced on August 1, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 06:29:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1754 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277859</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed as the Tribunal restricted the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) to 30% of the total addition, in line with previous rulings. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to limit the disallowance accordingly and allowed the assessee to seek similar treatment in subsequent years. The decision provided relief to the assessee and emphasized adherence to legal principles. The judgment was pronounced on August 1, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>