<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 60 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the deletion of additions of unexplained income and interest based on findings that the promissory notes were executed in 1982 and the income had already been taxed in a previous assessment year. The interest addition was also deleted as the assessee was not following the mercantile system of accounting. The application under section 256(1) was rejected as the issues were factual rather than legal, leading to the affirmation of the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:08:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 60 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the deletion of additions of unexplained income and interest based on findings that the promissory notes were executed in 1982 and the income had already been taxed in a previous assessment year. The interest addition was also deleted as the assessee was not following the mercantile system of accounting. The application under section 256(1) was rejected as the issues were factual rather than legal, leading to the affirmation of the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>