<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (11) TMI 25 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277843</link>
    <description>The court quashed the unauthorized demand made by the third respondent on 4th June 1951. It upheld the validity of Section 7(2) of the Finance Act, 1951, allowing the respondents to collect tax lawfully. The respondents were directed to bear the costs of the paper book and the petitioner&#039;s costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (11) TMI 25 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277843</link>
      <description>The court quashed the unauthorized demand made by the third respondent on 4th June 1951. It upheld the validity of Section 7(2) of the Finance Act, 1951, allowing the respondents to collect tax lawfully. The respondents were directed to bear the costs of the paper book and the petitioner&#039;s costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>