<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 49 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15937</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras held in favor of the assessee, a subsidiary of a trading company, allowing the deduction for a contribution made towards an approved gratuity fund for employees under section 36(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act. The court determined that employees from the holding company, taken over by the assessee, were eligible for gratuity, fulfilling the conditions for the deduction. The court emphasized that the inquiry under the Act is limited to meeting prescribed conditions, not the duration of employee service. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the contribution to the gratuity fund was deductible, against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:59:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 49 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15937</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras held in favor of the assessee, a subsidiary of a trading company, allowing the deduction for a contribution made towards an approved gratuity fund for employees under section 36(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act. The court determined that employees from the holding company, taken over by the assessee, were eligible for gratuity, fulfilling the conditions for the deduction. The court emphasized that the inquiry under the Act is limited to meeting prescribed conditions, not the duration of employee service. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the contribution to the gratuity fund was deductible, against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>