<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1400 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372631</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the transfer order under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act due to the lack of specific reasons provided in the order, emphasizing the importance of detailed reasoning in such decisions. The matter was remitted back to the first respondent to issue a fresh order with specific reasons within two weeks, following the principles outlined in relevant case law. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1400 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372631</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the transfer order under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act due to the lack of specific reasons provided in the order, emphasizing the importance of detailed reasoning in such decisions. The matter was remitted back to the first respondent to issue a fresh order with specific reasons within two weeks, following the principles outlined in relevant case law. The writ petition was allowed, and no costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>