<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1382 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372613</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, allowing the assessee to claim the interest deduction under Section 24(b) for Dhanwatay House, restricted to the share of income from the AOP. The ITAT emphasized that appellate authorities have the jurisdiction to entertain claims not made in the original or revised return, provided they are substantiated by the facts on record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 11:00:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1382 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372613</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, allowing the assessee to claim the interest deduction under Section 24(b) for Dhanwatay House, restricted to the share of income from the AOP. The ITAT emphasized that appellate authorities have the jurisdiction to entertain claims not made in the original or revised return, provided they are substantiated by the facts on record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>