<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1381 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372612</link>
    <description>The ITAT directed the AO to allocate 25% of other project-related expenses to be capitalized under the WIP account, partially allowing the appeal against the disallowance of expenses in the assessment order for AY 2012-13. The judgment emphasized the lack of justification for expense allocation by both the assessee and the AO, requiring a reasonable allocation of expenses related to the project.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 11:00:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1381 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372612</link>
      <description>The ITAT directed the AO to allocate 25% of other project-related expenses to be capitalized under the WIP account, partially allowing the appeal against the disallowance of expenses in the assessment order for AY 2012-13. The judgment emphasized the lack of justification for expense allocation by both the assessee and the AO, requiring a reasonable allocation of expenses related to the project.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>